Stan Meyer EPG Gas to Power Electric Particle Generator
Now consider the work with magnetic liquids in California where a drop of magnetic liquid moving through
3 .questions Are the magnetic droplets acting like the neodymium battery train ( homopolar magnet)
and if the copper coil is made into a circular loop and pickup coils placed around the
"track" ( as in the multitier epg) is useful power obtained from the permanently magnetized droplets
it is our belief that Stans Work has been keep secret and being slowly handed out to universities to keep them showing something
I deleted my post regard ElectroStatic Pulsing over Magnetic Pulsing.
After reviewing the thread below...
I understand now that using magnetics is the ideal mode of use of the EPG, but requires the Argon/Cobalt/Nickel, magnetically polarized gas matrix.
I also, reviewed the "House meeting in New Zealand" video where Stan talks about the EPG and the magnetized gas.
I thought for sure that Stan talks about water propulsion on some video...
Maybe I just mis-understood what he was talking about...
Just reviewed the 3rd video of the "House meeting in New Zealand", where he covers the fact that when using laser light within the EPG (He does this to increase the mass of the atomic gas matrix), then, you no-longer need to motivate the gas, because it's the shock wave of the light itself that causes the electrical field generation (which is then caught by the pickup coils), as the electrons move away from the atomic nucleus, which then results is a higher magnetic energy in the gas. Thus, powering all of New Zealand with a single EPG, and entering the relm of OU.
Now, back to the Magnetic Gas Lattice...
Argon (Lubricator, Non Electric, Non Magnetic)
Generate using HV to a pure Cobalt wire.
Generate using HV to a pure Nickel wire.
Generate using HV to a pure Nickel wire.
Generate Cobalt and Nickel Ions using HV within an Argon filled chamber.
- Pass Gas Mixture through VIC and expose to laser energy.
- This destabilizes the Atomic Structures of the main elements in the Gas. So that that we can extract some electrons from them.
- Use electron extraction circuit to remove extra electrons. Now our atoms will be will to take on covalent bonds that they would normally never take on.
- Allow Unstable Gas to stabilize into the new Gas Matrix by making new covalent bonds.
Pump gases into EPG.
Test EPG for appropriate Magnetic Qualities of the Gas Lattice.
- Does pulsing it result in some energy output from the pickup coils?
Damn! That boy was Brilliant!
- Not just theory, but applied science.
- Mechanics, Electronics, Chemistry, Nuclear Physics...
- Amazing stuff!
The Purpose of these pages is for your to quickly see learn and advance further on replicating Stan Meyers to Assist us getting this open source to market
As you experiment share your picture and video on you tube
As a Team we advance fast
the dates on this aprox 2005
and than 2012 there was alot of work done
than recently 2016 , Years are passing we need people working on this
Not all of the early EPG models of Stanley Meyer's devices used mechanical pumps to move
magnetic slurry or gas within the copper spiral cores. One model used linear magnetic drive
pumps to circulate the slurry/gases. The other was the magnetic spin EPG. The six tier multiple
tier EPG (aka "gega series" or (6Tmaggasepg) designed for home power generation also had
similar pumps. The seven tier system is now thought to have had a bottom tier with electronics
for control of the flow of the magnetic gas but not pickup coils
see attached 2 new images of the EPGs
1. Magnetic Spin EPG
2 Magnetic Drive EPG
3 Example Linear Mag Drive
Above is a photo of one of Stanley's EPG system.
The EPG system or Electrical Particle Generator is basically a particle accelerator.
The EPG system is something that Stan was working on along with the Water Fuel Cell technology. It is suppose to be able to amplify the incoming signal/power to a much greater amperage / voltage.
It seems that not many people know that Stan was even working on this system. I have been doing extensive research and development on this system.
Some Important Notes from alot of study
After Studying Searl Magnetic SEG 2 things seam very apparent and possible with Stand machines
I call these Introvert (Stans Way) and extrovert.( electrons from our side tube)
The Stan Meyer Invert Method his stated method of having a magnetic gas move through tube,
could in fact be improved by have sensitive fer rite pickup inside the tube to make the voltage spikes, further enhancing stand magnetic stimulation of coils on outside of tube. Some of this was thought of as Searl Using the Gathering and Damming of electron using ferit in his system.
it could also extract elections from gas inside tube which is not necessary;y same as Stan methods
similar to a Magnetic Flow Meter which would increase sensitivity of a could pickup or magnetic movement of a pick up coil, ( as there seam to be some debate about the copper preventing the magnetic gas making flux in pick up coils coil.
It seams pulsing gas with LED Laser will cause lithium oxygen and h2 to cool and become magnetic.
Also of Large Turbine use pure h2 to cool the machines ,gas flows through and cool the steel
some run the gas through the stators.
it is total possible that h2 or Magnetic gas compose could impart more electrons into the stator by attracting electron from air.
And Such the Epg Stans Unit will get vert cold when gas flowing as a rate of speed through it
it will in fact attract electron from air these could be harvested just like searl did. As the Ionising and air will flow to centre of egp.
Further pulsing with laser will increase the effect
Scientists Create First Ever Magnetic Gas
By Stuart Fox September 18, 2009
For decades, scientists have debated whether or not gasses could display the same magnetic properties
as solids. Now, thanks to some MIT scientists, they know the answer is a freezing cold yes.
MIT researchers have observed magnetism in an atomic gas of lithium cooled down to 150 millionths
of a degree above absolute zero. This experiment represents a point of unification between condensed
matter research and the field of atomic science and lasers, and could influence areas such as data storage
and medical diagnostics.
To get the lithium gas so cold, the researchers trained an infrared laser beam on the gaseous cloud.
Laser cooling is the primary method physicists use to lower gas temperatures to near absolute zero.
The laser essentially stun the atoms, slowing them down, and thus lowering the temperature.
After initially growing, the cloud began to shrink. That shrinkage, combined with the speed of
expansion after the laser turned off, indicated that the lithium atoms had become magnetic.
"It's very important from an overall theoretical point of view because it gives us an understanding
of magnetism at its smallest possible scale," Scott Pritchard, an MIT professor, and one of
the experiment leaders, told us.
Improving magnetic gas directions or coil sensitivity
Backup of Video
This is my Copper EPG i will be using for testing. The wire will be installed next, at a bare minimum there will be close to 2 miles of AWG22 magnet wire on this EPG.
You can see my first attempt at the EPG using plastic at the end of this page.
Here is some of the progress i have made. The divider plates are installed, next i start the wire winding.
I'm building a wire winder (the wood in the background ) to help wind the 2+ miles of wire... thanks to YouTube user hawk491000 for the idea on the winder!
Update Photo Here: as of 2-8-12
Stanley A Meyer Mechanical Pump EPG coil parameters
The diameter of the outermost EPG channel or loop can be estimated.at about 17 inches
Therefore the outer circumference can be estimated at 17 x Pi inches
By dividing the circumference by the observed number of coils an estimated length of each coil can be made.
A further refinement in precision can be made by subtraction of the total length L occupied by coil spacers.
So in the case where you count, let's say as way of example, 59 coils and 60 coil end spacers, each winding is
1/59th of the circumference of 53.4 inches or calculated at about 0.905 inches long.
Because of the high resolution photographs available, estimates of a coil can be made directly.
Using a known measurement such as the outside diameter of tubing ie. 0.500 inches
in conjunction with a screen distance tool in Photoshop(r) or another program such as
Screen Caliper(r) the length of the coil can be made.
Since the outside diameter of the core channel is known, an estimate of the thickness of depth of winding
may be obtained by using photogrammetry to estimate the thickness of the winding.
The total thickness or height of the wound coil is first measured. Then the core diameter is then subtracted.
the resulting figure is then divided by two. This is the height or thickness of the winding around the core
So now we have what is call a winding window with height H and length L.
H TIMES L = A the area of the winding window. Think of it a a cross-sectional view of
the coil windings with the ends of each wire being viewed.
Something like this:
representing 3 layers of wire with 12 wraps (the II symbolizing the coil dividers)
3 layers of wire by 12 wires wide or 36 turns or wraps of wire around a bobbin
In this exsmple, a thinner wire could be wound 18 times on the same length of bobbin.
NUMBER OF WINDS
Since the gauge of the wire can be estimated with a good amount of precision
,the use of circle packing theory (see wiki) theory can be used to determine the
number of turns that can fit through this winding window( Area equals Height
One factor that helps, is that wires come in standard thicknesses or diameters
For convenience the AWG (American Wire Gauge) is used in electrical
and electronic work, Electrical wiring in the U.S. is often 10,12 or 14AWG
Electronic work is often uses 18,22, or 30 AWG gauge wire
Whatever the reason the smaller the AWG number, the thicker or larger
the diameter of wire!!
The reason this helps in photogrammetry, is that the gauges are discrete values
Look at this table:
AWG Diameter in inches AWG Diameter in Inches
10 .1019 20 .0320
12 .0808 22 .0253
14 .0641 24 .0201
16 .0508 26 .0159
18 .0403 28 .0126
The 16 gauge wire is about 25% thicker than 18 gauge
The 22 gauge wire is about 25% thicker than 24 gauge
Not to get too technical, but this is a logarithmic scale, but the important concept
is the PERCENTAGE OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GAUGES IS LARGE
in relation to the precision achievable in photogrammetry
This means for a given photogrammetric distance is it easier to pick out the exact
gauge of wire used because the precision of the that method is often less than 2 to 5%.
There is a branch of mathematics which describes how many circles of uniform
size can be drawn in a given area. It goes by several names but let's just call it
Circle Packing Theory.
By determining the winding window size, the appropriate circle packing fraction can be used to
determine a close estimate of the number of windings per coil. In the previous example
cross-section of a coil, it represents one type of winding
Another type is hexagonal winding, with the layers arranged more like a honeycomb
And thirdly there is a random type of winding with lots of crossover and gaps
The hexagonal packing is the closest or most densest method of winding coils
with a value of 0.906 or about 91% of the area occupied by wire with the
balance of the area being gaps between the wires
Square geometry winding with each winding of wire directly on top the
layer below( No offset) has a value of 0.785 It is not at close or dense
a winding as hexagonal winding
A random wind often a more gaps but the packing ratio is highly dependent
on the size of the wire relative the length and width of the winding window
Consider for a moment two equally sized sheets of sandpaper.
One is coated coarse grade grit, the other coated coated with a fine grit used for
final sanding. The arrangement of the sand grains is random in both
cases but there are fewer grain of sand on the coarse paper and
many more grains of sand on the finer grit paper.
This is analogous to the number of random winding or wraps of wire in a given
cross sectional area on a bobbin. Intuitively very small wire gauges have a
higher packing fraction than large. This is a difficult value to quantify
SO IN SOME CASES IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TURNS
IN SOME CASES EMPIRCAL METHODS OR TEST WINDINGS MIGHT BE NECESSARY
As an example if the winding window is 1 square inch and the AWG is 22, and the tighter hexagonal
winding factor is used(0.906) then 0.906 square inches of that window is occupied by the area of the wire..
The cross-sectional area of AWG 22 is 0.0005 inches.
0.906/divided by 0.0005 =approx 1800 turns
With precision or square winding a factor of 0.78 can be used resulting in an estimate of 1560 turns through
a 1 inch square window
Basically the application of the above method may be used to estimate the number
of windings for an EPG coil by photogrammetric means in some cases
As search of empircal transformer design charts might be instructive for this third case
POWER OUTPUT DEPENDS ON METHOD OF WIRING PICKUP COILS
It appears as though the mechanical drive epg was wired in parallel lower voltage and and a
higher amperage due to more coils
While the multitier EPG was higher voltage due to fewer coils and many windings which required of multiple tiers
It also could be that the effective value of the flux in the mag-gas systems was lower that the higher density ferro fluids
which might explain the need to operate at 90 ips velocity
Russ Epg Build Attempt
The Picture Below show the end game System Stan Made
Top is a HCAT hho no flame can be turned to heat and water video to right
heat can further go to boiler or steam turbine
But Which Gas?
I think helium is a good choice. I looked up Helium 3 which is used with MRI machines to scan the inside of lung passage ways. He3 has magnetic properties that can be viewed on the MRI machine.
ote the similarity to what Haisch and Moddel did with a Casimir cavity and a noble gas...
One can use a voltage gradient to separate the two states of ammonia (N-Up, N-Down), pump the N-Up into a resonant cavity, then feed that resonant cavity with 23.87 GHz to force the N-Up ammonia molecules to relax to their ground state, giving off microwave photons in the process. The energy given off is in resonance with the 23.87 GHz pump. https://www.kenwood.com/i/products/info/amateur/ts50s.html
Since ammonia will naturally be a mixture of N-Up and N-Down, given time, the 'relaxed' ammonia when released from the resonant cavity will regain the normal proportion of N-Up and N-Down due to random thermal fluctuations forcing some of the ammonia molecules back into an N-Up state. Rinse and repeat.
This is the basis for a MASER (Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation).
Could this have been what Stan Meyer was doing with his "magnetic gas", using the microwaves to dissociate water?
I seem to remember that the exhaust of his buggy was reported as foul smelling, ammonia. Would he only exhaust it after an extraction cycle? Is there enough to be extracted? From what I understood before, the water (or it's components) from the fuel tank was somehow made to react with intake air, the nitrogen finding it's way to the NH3 ammonia exhaust fumes. If there is some serious energy left in the form of ammonia obtained this way, one can expect Stan to have extracted it.
Stan's work is very compelling, way above my comprehension. I hope someone figures it out, or takes a part of the work and gets it to stand by itself.
EPG Power System
Could the very first patent Stan Meyer ever submitted be the key to understanding his subsequent water fuel related inventions? Meyer titled this patent “Electrical Particle Generator”, a name which would not attract too much attention to itself.
Furthermore, Meyer never patented this device in the USA. He only patented it in the Canadian patent office which had much less traffic at the time. Did Meyer want to place this invention into the public record while, in some sense, keeping the “secret” hidden in plain sight.
The patent for this invention can be downloaded here.
Stan referred to this device in his subsequent patents as the “Unipolar Pulsing Core Transformer”, a name which anyone who has spent time on Meyer’s work will recognize.
But what exactly is this device?
Here is how it operates:
How can one get magnetized gas into the core? Here is the approach that I took:
Here are pictures of my first implementation of the device.
When one adds primary and secondary windings on to this core and then energizes the primary with a flow of charge, a magnetic field is produced.
The magnetized oxyhydrogen gas particles which have been added into the core are attracted to the S end of the primary magnetic field and repelled by the N end of the same field.
The effect is accelerative upon the particles. As the gas flow velocity increases, the particles move ever faster around the core.
The faster the particles are accelerated, the greater the charge amplitude induced on the secondary side as the “tiny magnets” pass in a fluid aggregate over these windings.
Note that PVC or flexible vinyl tubing works better for fluid core construction then copper or aluminum.
The first core I made (shown above) was made from copper, but in subsequent builds I used PVC.
Copper and aluminum have a dampening effect upon magnetic fields and so are a poor choice for use in the core.
In many of Meyer’s patents (such as seen below), he refers to a Unipolar Magnetic Field Coupling and uses his “Loop” symbol notation.
Here Meyer refers to the gas filled “pulsing core”, and it’s “unipolar magnetic field coupling” action.
He always used these cryptic circles on his block diagrams to indicate the effect. Of course, he never disclosed this notation explicitly.
I think this notation represents the magnetic fields of tiny magnetized gas ions, which when accelerated by the primary coil on the gas core, moves across the secondary coil.
A0201-03 I was setting up the variable list for Problem 4 on the power output ad input see if this is reasonable--Q's on
clarification or suggestions to team drop box or pm if your are an ionizationx member
_________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ ________________________
MAIN DISCUSSION FOLLOWS BELOW
VARIABLE LIST AND VALUE RANGE
VARIABLE VALUE SOURCE/// REFERENCE
V1 = velocity of magnetic field movement per second 50-90 ips In 2019 Handout in Bremen Conference
N1= number of twists per unit length of non-magnetic spiral divider per unit length .3 - 1.2 Estimate for M4 considering thickness and core d